How Inexperienced Psychics And San Diego Medium Can Mislead A Sitter

By Charles Reynolds


Many sitters tend to get very excited and are extremely impressed with the ability of an accurate psychic that can pick up information surrounding the sitters, their past and present situations and also their loved ones in the Spirit World. This response to accurate evidence and the trust building that it supports, while welcome can easily become misused or abused by an unscrupulous intermediate. The article talks of how inexperienced psychics and San Diego Medium can mislead a sitter.

The trust that a sitter develops with their intermediate over issues of the Spirit World, which the uninitiated are unfamiliar or inexperienced with, makes them vulnerable to statements and opinions of the psychic that go beyond appropriate decorum and their professional expertise. The sitter who wholeheartedly believes whatever the psychic tells them about their future can be subject to an unscrupulous medium's prejudices and egotistical pronouncements.

Many people are familiar with the term "ectoplasm", which originates from seances where physical intermediate would manifest this weird substance out of "thin air, " and that would often take physical shape and form, and many believe was how those in "spirit" could reappear during these sessions.The problems with physical mediumship for me?

An unscrupulous medium may fib or exaggerate over what information and the type of contact they are capable of making. They may even go as far as claiming they are linking with the sitter's deceased loved ones and giving the impression that they are in contact with the Spirit World. Psychics and Mediums are naturally good observers, and they can use that particular skill to get clues and fish for information by observing people's reactions and body language.

Direct Voice: These are people who speak in the voices of the deceased... Often communicating in languages, dialects, mannerisms, and tones that match those who have died 100%. (And more often than not, these are people the intermediate have never heard of, met or knew in life) Again, there are hundreds (if not thousands) of cases where this has been demonstrated, and the people in the room who knew the deceased in life, come away believing they were speaking with their loved ones, through the body of the intermediate.

This misleading or deceptiveness is not only unfair to the sitter, but is damaging to the profession and other intermediates. As a intermediate myself, I'm very keen to witness how other professional work with the spirit world, and have been fortunate enough to have had quite a few sittings with proficient and principled intermediates.

Nevertheless, before I came into spiritualism, I had several readings from some "famous psychics" and had had unpleasant experiences. One devious and dodgy tactic used was that they would immediately ask questions about my life situation and from what I said they would conclude my future life. They said, for example, that I would get divorced within one year which didn't happen.

Mental Mediumship! This is the type of reading I prefer, and have had amazing, exciting and enlightening experiences with personally, for well over a decade in my own life. A mental one would be someone like John Edward, or George Anderson, or any of the better known psychic we see on TV. Mental is very evidential to me and can give you proof that your loved one's continue on... In a way that isn't weird, creepy or hard to wrap your brain around when the session is over.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment